Hi All,
I have application where databases/tables spread between two
servers(different building, wireless connection). During data entries from
front-end, the application must access the tables on both servers
interactively.
The question is :
- is Linked Server is the only way to access tables on another server ?
- How is the performance of accessing tables on local server compared to
accessing tables on linked server ?
Thanks for your comments,
KristTristant,
"tristant" <krislioe@.cbn.net.id> wrote in message news:OpzPgQRnDHA.1408@.TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> Hi All,
> I have application where databases/tables spread between two
> servers(different building, wireless connection). During data entries from
> front-end, the application must access the tables on both servers
> interactively.
> The question is :
> - is Linked Server is the only way to access tables on another server ?
No. You can replicate the data from one server to the other, or use
openrowset for an adhoc connection
> - How is the performance of accessing tables on local server compared to
> accessing tables on linked server ?
As you would expect - much worse.
Especially with WiFi, where you don't get all the bandwidth claimed anyway
and should be using VPN or other overhead to keep the link safe.
That said, you are not normally puting a whole lot of data through the link, so it
is still perfectly useable, my preference would be to have a client connection to
only one server, and use replication. But you don't say anything about updates,
or data volumes so it's a bit hard to comment.
Regards
AJ
No comments:
Post a Comment